Artist Statement
5/2011
This body of work comprises
selected paintings and constructions from 2003-2010. The pieces
range in scale from large oil paintings to framed miniature constructions
and encompass a wide variety of processes, including poured paint,
metal and wood assemblage, and collage. Previous shows focused
on the relationship of fluid paint and geometric architectural
elements, the space between thoughts before words are formed,
and the blurring of boundaries between painting and sculpture.
All adding up to the question: "What is it?"
My intention is to place
the viewer in a ground of uncertainty, and the work in a place
where it can't be comfortably labeled as either this or that,
or from here or there, now or then. Hopefully, with that uncertainty,
the constructed paintings acquire a more universal and timeless
quality open to the present, and to that aspect of newness that
never vanishes.
Artist Statement
4/2009
For a number of years,
I've been intrigued by Goethe's (1749-1832) aesthetic that the
artist's function is to make visible the hidden laws of nature
by creating a parallel order. The beautiful is a sensory phenomenon
in the form of an idea, not an idea in the form of a sensory
phenomenon. So one does not seek to give form to an idea, but
one seeks the idea that corresponds to the form. It's about finding.
This body of work explores
the workings of the intuitive mind in conjunction with the shaped
canvas and the fluidity of paint in the way it's applied either
with a squeeze bottle or poured. The process of working becomes
a reconciliation of structured geometrical, architectural shapes
with a spontaneous, less structured painting event and its residual
lines and shapes. The relationship between the two: the structured/unstructured
sets up a dialogue where one finds a resolution to opposition,
and one finds meaning through the process itself: building and
painting - painterly architectonics.
Painterly Architectonics
was first used at the beginning of the last century by the Russian
Constructivists in reference to the connection between painting
and architecture. Their paintings became examples of a pure spatial
articulation defined by materials. Elements would solicit a perspectival
reading while simultaneously defying it. Popova, in 1918, wrote:
"
A transformed
form is an abstract one and is completely subject to architectonic
necessity and
to the general constructive objectives. The
artist gains complete freedom in absolute nonobjectivity, orienting
and constructing the line, plane, volumetric elements and color
weight."
It became evident that
a subject is unnecessary in painting. One can experience great
joy just seeing colors and lines and satisfying an instinct for
harmony and the communication of beauty (the mystery of life.)
The works in this show,
use blocks of color to structure space and give a definite sensation
of orange (confident), green (nurturing), gold (transformational),
blue (inspirational), black (mysterious, protective), energy
coming from the painting. Further, the paintings suggest a cosmic
floating sense of space with their loosely patterned grids and
atmospheric gradations. Lines and planes are used to open up
space. In the framed miniatures, this aerial sense of space is
translated into a feeling of intimate immensity. Visual elements
suggest and are juxtaposed to function rather like a Haiku poem.
|